Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”


Letter to the Editor


Giulia M Muraca, Amanda Skoll, Sarka Lisonkova, Yasser Sabr, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, KS Joseph
Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189(43), 2017, pp. E1344-E1345


Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Muraca, G. M., Skoll, A., Lisonkova, S., Sabr, Y., Brant, R., Cundiff, G. W., & Joseph, K. S. (2017). Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(43), E1344–E1345. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.733350


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M, Amanda Skoll, Sarka Lisonkova, Yasser Sabr, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, and KS Joseph. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal 189, no. 43 (2017): E1344–E1345.


MLA   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M., et al. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189, no. 43, 2017, pp. E1344–E1345, doi:10.1503/cmaj.733350.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{giulia2017a,
  title = {Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”},
  year = {2017},
  issue = {43},
  journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
  pages = {E1344-E1345},
  volume = {189},
  doi = {10.1503/cmaj.733350},
  author = {Muraca, Giulia M and Skoll, Amanda and Lisonkova, Sarka and Sabr, Yasser and Brant, Rollin and Cundiff, Geoffrey W and Joseph, KS}
}

Abstract

We thank Dr. Wood[1][1] for his interest in our article[2][2] and his comments. Respectfully, we disagree with several of his assertions, as they are unfounded or incorrect.

Our main analysis was restricted to deliveries that occurred after a prolonged second stage of labour, to ensure an