Giulia M. Muraca, PhD - Response to “Data limitations may affect

Journal article

G. Muraca, A. Skoll, S. Lisonkova, Y. Sabr, R. Brant, G. Cundiff, K. Joseph
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017

Cite

APA Click to copy
Muraca, G., Skoll, A., Lisonkova, S., Sabr, Y., Brant, R., Cundiff, G., & Joseph, K. (2017). Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.” Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Muraca, G., A. Skoll, S. Lisonkova, Y. Sabr, R. Brant, G. Cundiff, and K. Joseph. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal (2017).

MLA Click to copy
Muraca, G., et al. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{g2017a,
  title = {Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
  author = {Muraca, G. and Skoll, A. and Lisonkova, S. and Sabr, Y. and Brant, R. and Cundiff, G. and Joseph, K.}
}

Abstract

We thank Dr. Wood[1][1] for his interest in our article[2][2] and his comments. Respectfully, we disagree with several of his assertions, as they are unfounded or incorrect.

Our main analysis was restricted to deliveries that occurred after a prolonged second stage of labour, to ensure an