The authors reply to “The end of forceps deliveries?” and “Beware selection bias”


Letter to the Editor


Giulia M Muraca, Sarka Lisonkova, KS Joseph, Amanda Skoll, Geoffrey W Cundiff, Rollin Brant, Yasser Sabr
Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189(34), 2017, pp. E1098


Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Muraca, G. M., Lisonkova, S., Joseph, K. S., Skoll, A., Cundiff, G. W., Brant, R., & Sabr, Y. (2017). The authors reply to “The end of forceps deliveries?” and “Beware selection bias.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(34), E1098. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.733285


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M, Sarka Lisonkova, KS Joseph, Amanda Skoll, Geoffrey W Cundiff, Rollin Brant, and Yasser Sabr. “The Authors Reply to ‘The End of Forceps Deliveries?’ and ‘Beware Selection Bias.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal 189, no. 34 (2017): E1098.


MLA   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M., et al. “The Authors Reply to ‘The End of Forceps Deliveries?’ and ‘Beware Selection Bias.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189, no. 34, 2017, p. E1098, doi:10.1503/cmaj.733285.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{giulia2017a,
  title = {The authors reply to “The end of forceps deliveries?” and “Beware selection bias”},
  year = {2017},
  issue = {34},
  journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
  pages = {E1098},
  volume = {189},
  doi = {10.1503/cmaj.733285},
  author = {Muraca, Giulia M and Lisonkova, Sarka and Joseph, KS and Skoll, Amanda and Cundiff, Geoffrey W and Brant, Rollin and Sabr, Yasser}
}

Abstract

We thank Dr. Pairaudeau[1][1] and Dr. Barrett and colleagues[2][2] for their interest and expert commentary on our article.[3][3]

The high rates of severe perinatal and maternal morbidity reported in our analyses may or may not be reflective of adverse outcome rates following midpelvic operative